Rights Continuity

Execution went digital. Evidence review did not.

Every handoff moves the right to a new system. Part of its evidence stays behind.

One record for the right, every field with its source. A package a third party can check.

Request a demo Read the litepaper
  1. 2024Signed · originator system
  2. 2025Assigned · buyer's servicer
  3. 2026Moved · new jurisdiction
  4. TodayReviewed from scratch
  5. VERIDEXCompared field by field

Member of the GLEIF Partners Program
Networks and environments under evaluation
  • Canton Network
  • Pharos
  • Base
  • Solana
THE PROBLEM

Signing is the easy part. Proving it later is what breaks.

Each new reviewer rebuilds the same evidence file from scratch.

Request demo → See how it works
Built for teams in highly regulated industries
Banking Private credit Trade finance Digital assets Public sector
8×1×
independent reviews evidence file they consult
8 reviewing parties
Banks Trade Web3 Fintech Capital Real estate Energy Government
Separate review by each party
Each party gathers sources and context independently
Rights Continuity
One assembled evidence file, available to authorized reviewers
sources and changes recorded
Signed document
source record

Today the same document is rebuilt at every handoff - slow, costly, and drifting out of sync.

With VERIDEX the evidence is assembled once and stays available to each authorized reviewer, with its sources and its recorded changes.

Illustrative workflow with eight parties; time savings will be assessed in pilots.

Slower cycles Duplicated cost Evidence drifts
Assembled once Less reconstruction Declared scope

WHAT VERIDEX ALETHIA IS

Rights Continuity - post-execution reviewability for documented rights.

Not a new system to replace yours. It sits on top of what you already run and keeps the evidence reviewable.

VERIDEXEvidence Layer Layer on top
Your existing infrastructure - unchanged
Who signed it, under which standard (PAdES/eIDAS), and when. The system of record and the instrument's state changes. Who controls the instrument now, and its chain of custody. The scope and jurisdiction under which the evidence stays reviewable.
Compose, not replace

Built to keep evidence reviewable across systems, jurisdictions and time.

  1. Composes evidence

    Records the signature, the source-system data and the documents you already hold, side by side, without replacing what you run.

  2. Preserves reviewability

    Keeps the trail as the instrument changes, so whoever reviews it next can see what changed and when.

  3. Delivers a reviewable package

    Packages the evidence under a defined scope, with what was and was not compared, for whoever has to act next.

Works with the documents you already hold

  • Signed loan agreements
  • Loan tapes and source-system exports
  • Title and register extracts you upload
  • The governing law and jurisdiction
HOW IT WORKS

How it works - in three steps.

  1. 01

    Assembly

    Gathers signature, identity, authority, source & scope.

  2. 02

    Preservation

    Cryptographic timestamp; stays reviewable as it evolves.

  3. 03

    Delivery

    Assembled, labelled package under a defined scope.

ONE PLATFORM. SIX PRODUCTS. ONE MECHANISM.

One evidence model. Six ways it's consumed.

The snapshot

Live Right Passport

A structured view of a right's recorded evidence: sources, subsequent events and gaps that require review.

Controlled testing
Live Right Passport
The cost of asking the old way
95days
$2,598cost per client, 2023
+11 daysvs 2022

was the global average to complete a KYC review for a corporate client in 2023 - up from 84 the year before, at $2,598 a client.

Average time to complete a KYC review, global+11 days vs 2022
1007550250
20222023
ForGeneral Counsel or Investment Director at a non-bank private credit fund
SourceFenergo | KYC Trends Report 2023 | n=1,100+
The monitor

Rights Control Tower

Continuous lifecycle tracking with state-change alerts.

Controlled testing
Rights Control Tower
What the obligation actually is
1static matrix
Kept updatedthrough the contract
Periodic accountabilityto the beneficiaries

Decreto 0510/2026 requires the risk matrix to be kept updated through the life of the contract, and periodic accountability to the beneficiaries. A continuous duty has to be evidenced continuously.

One disclosure against twelve months of exposure
JanDec
Disclosed once. Reported periodically. <em class="pb-hi">Exposed continuously.</em>
ForThe external auditor or revisor fiscal - and the litigation firms already winning these cases
SourceDecreto 0510/2026 (CO) | Diario Oficial 53496, 20 May 2026
The dossier

Proof Pack

Evidence package assembled for a specific review: an audit, an assignment or a dispute.

Controlled testing
Proof Pack
How long a record has to hold
16years
2007the transaction
2023the judgment

between a 2007 note transaction and final judgment in 2023. The claim was not even filed until 2018, and the documents still had to be readable at the end.

Transaction to judgment, one mark per year
20072023
<em class="pb-hi">One year per mark.</em>
ForLitigation Partner at a Madrid firm - or Internal Audit Director at a US mid-cap
SourceLoreley v Credit Suisse [2023] EWHC 2759 (Comm)
The index

Evidence Continuity Index

An experimental signal for how complete and reviewable an evidence file is. It does not assess the asset and does not determine legal validity.

Controlled testing
Evidence Continuity Index
What is actually checked
7health checks
6 blockingof the 7 checks
1 advisoryof the 7 checks
The seven checks and how each one fails
  • Signature validBlocking
  • Chain completeBlocking
  • OCSP statusBlocking
  • Integrity intactBlocking
  • Jurisdiction recognizedBlocking
  • AML checks completedBlocking
  • Not expiredAdvisory
Any blocking failsAdvisory onlyAll pass
ForRisk Manager or Curator of a DeFi lending vault
The boundary

Disclosure Envelope

Defines what each authorized recipient may see, and the stated limits on its use.

Controlled testing
Disclosure Envelope
Who sees what
4scopes
2 tiersof disclosure
4 scopesin total
What each scope is allowed to see
Provider | source type | freshness
PublicCounterparty
…and the observed value
InternalAuditor
Four scopes. <em class="pb-hi">One line where the number appears.</em>
ForServes the recipient of an evidence file rather than a buyer of its own
Agent reliance interface

ARI

Exposes a right's evidence-state for an AI agent to consult before acting.

Controlled testing
ARI
Why a machine has to do the checking
5hours
T+211:30am, next day
T+19pm, trade day

is what T+1 leaves between the 4pm ET close and the 9pm ET affirmation cutoff, against 19.5 hours under T+2.

Time left to manage exceptions after the cut-off
The affirmation cut-off, <em class="pb-hi">before and after.</em>
ForThe agent operator - a protocol's risk function, or a custodian running a pre-operation check
SourceDTCC | The Key to T+1 Success, Jan 2024
And the mechanism
Threshold check without disclosure

VTE

VERIDEX Threshold Evidence

Check a counterparty against your threshold without seeing their book.

Today you demand the record or take their word for it. VTE fixes your rule first, then returns one signed answer. The underlying record stays in its source system.

Controlled testing
Illustrative answer does this position clear your threshold?

2 signatures (VERIDEX test keys) | rule fixed in advance | stated expiry

Why a third path

Today there are two paths, and both leave a gap.

Send the record

The counterparty now holds client data it must store, protect, and may have to act on.

Accept a representation

A signed statement whose basis the counterparty cannot inspect.

Answer only the question

One answer, checked against a rule fixed in advance, signed by the attesting parties, with a stated expiry.

What VTE does not deliver to the counterparty
  • The full book
  • Custody or settlement
  • A legal opinion
  • A valuation or guarantee

In controlled testing on Canton DevNet from our own validator: four question types, main path only. No external institution or signer yet. In a dispute, the committed value can be opened under VERIDEX governance. And the answer is worth what the attesting party is worth: if the subject attests to its own figures, the response is not independent verification and should not be presented as such.

Bring one threshold you check by hand today, or cover with extra collateral. Book a 30-minute pilot call →
WHO IT IS FOR

One evidence model. Eight sectors where the same gap appears.

Banks / Financial Institutions

Evidence is often rebuilt by hand for an audit or a transfer.

Trade Finance & Correspondent Banking

Evidence for a trade instrument sits across banks, documents and operational systems.

Fintech & Digital Platforms

Client onboarding often repeats a verification that was already done.

Capital Markets

Identity, ownership and eligibility reviews can be repeated by each participant.

Web3, DeFi & Tokenized Assets

A token can move on-chain while the evidence for the underlying right stays elsewhere.

Real Estate & Property

Transfers and financing can require successive reviews of title and authority.

Energy & Commodities

Contracts, licenses and certifications lose their evidence trail as they move between counterparties.

Governments & Regulators

Oversight across jurisdictions can rely on sources that are not consistent between them.

WHY RIGHTS CONTINUITY MATTERS NOW

Distinct frameworks. A shared need for traceability.

Applicable requirements vary by right, by institution and by jurisdiction, and the frameworks do not agree with each other. VERIDEX helps organize the evidence used in those workflows. It does not certify compliance, and it does not replace the legal assessment each case requires.

AMERICAS
EUROPE + UK
GLOBAL
Evidence, not certification

VERIDEX does not certify compliance. It helps teams assemble the evidence used in workflows related to these frameworks.

The evidence is
  • Structured
  • Permissioned
  • Reviewable
WHAT'S NEW

Latest from VERIDEX Alethia.

View all posts
  1. News · Own validator node on Canton Network's public DevNet Rights Continuity only matters where the rights themselves move. Running a node on Canton is how the company gets close to that.
  2. News · Transfer agents and record-scoped silence: our SEC comment letter (S7-2026-30) The proposal would ask a transfer agent to reason about a chain of transactions. Nothing in it says where the record of that chain comes from.
  3. News · Now a member of the GLEIF Partners Program A registered LEI settles which entity. Rights Continuity is the work that starts after that.

Let's scope a controlled pilot together

Keep your evidence reviewable after execution.

Let’s talk about running VERIDEX on top of the systems you already run.

Request a demo Download litepaper

Tweaks

Estilo visual
Idioma